The U.S. has at least thrice offered Cuba disaster relief, and thrice, in ways that again reveal its crass nature, the Castro dictatorship has said, "No, we don't want your handouts, we want you to lift your embargo."
Meanwhile, Cubans struggle to survive in the wake of hurricanes Gustav and Ike.
Without exactly backing down from its adherence to the embargo, the United States has conceded the point, at least for now, to the dictatorship, by approving the sale to Cuba of $250 million in food and other agricultural material, including "wood, a material essential to rebuilding," the U.S. State Department said in a statement.
While falling way short of a total blockade, the embargo should be preserved as bargaining chip in any future negotiations with Cuba — after it releases political prisoners and institutes other reforms. But the American position is undermined, morally, politically and in other ways, by laws that allow Cuba to buy food and other items, as long as Havana pays upfront with cash. Despite the embargo — or perhaps, because of it — the United States has become the island's No. 1 foreign supplier of food.
I have been critical of the American policy allowing the sales, but for now, I am setting aside that opposition.
The thought of profiting by doing business with the Castros is distasteful, but hopefully the announced sales and other future deals will accomplish what all the blow-hard rhetoric and policy has not since Gustav and Ike: Helping the Cuban people.
Since the storms came ashore in Guantanamo and Isle of Youth and Piñar del Rio, political grandstanding by both the American and Cuban governments has blocked the delivery to suffering Cubans of all help possible. Washington and Havana have been unable to see through the forest of five decades of mistrust and rivalry, the trees, i.e. the people, felled by the storms. The U.S. maintains limits on how much help Cuban Americans can send to family members on the island, and the Cuban government can't even pretend to care about the welfare of the people.
Concluding that allowing Cuba to buy wood, cattle and other agricultural products will improve the lives of the average Cuba requires the assumption that the dictatorship will use what it has bought to benefit the people. That should not be easily conceded, but at least with the sales, cash is leaving, not going into Cuba. Also, with all the attention that relief efforts, and the Cuban government's response to disaster, are drawing, maybe it will be that much harder for the Castros to skim their cut off the top, as they have done in the past.
The irony remains that while the United States allows, if not facilitates the purchases by Havana, it hinders the ability of Cuban Americans to help family members on the island trying to rebuild after the recent storms by maintaining limits on remittances and travel.
Ag sales and remittances may not be enough to save Cubans trying to start over at less than zero, but that is no reason why they should be considered mutually exclusive. If the United States can allow American farming interests do do business with the dictatorship, why is it so dead-set against making it easier for Cuban Americans to help family members in need?
Recent Comments